- [[ai-in-assessment|Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Assessment]] - [[test-security|Test Security and Integrity]] - [[regulator-positions|Regulator positions]] - [[assessment-procurement-and-governance|Assessment procurement and governance]] - [[ai-marking-and-feedback-platforms|AI marking and feedback platforms]] - [[automated-item-generation|Automated item generation]] - [[ai-detection-and-authenticity|AI detection and authenticity]] - [[non-exam-assessment-authenticity|Non-exam assessment authenticity]] - [[ai-in-assessment-design|AI in assessment design]] - [[ai-literacy-and-assessment-design|AI literacy and assessment design]] - [[assessment-verification-and-learning-outcomes|Assessment verification and learning outcomes]] - [[campus-ai-ecosystems|Campus AI ecosystems]] - [[cognitive-offloading-and-ai|Cognitive offloading and AI]] - [[generative-ai-in-credentialing-assessments|Generative AI in credentialing assessments]] - [[llm-resistant-exams|LLM-resistant exams]] - [[on-screen-assessment|On-screen assessment]]

This Test Community Network wiki helps assessment professionals understand how AI affects assessment design, validity, security, cyber resilience, and operational practice. It is organised around durable topic pages rather than around a source register or vendor list. Use it to move from the broad question of integrity to the specific controls, trade-offs, and governance decisions that matter in live assessment programmes.

The Test Community Network AI & Assessment Wiki is a cited reference point for understanding how artificial intelligence is affecting assessment design, delivery, scoring, security, validity, fairness, regulation, identity assurance, and market practice.

### AI in assessment - [[ai-in-assessment-guardrails-vs-surveillance|AI guardrails versus surveillance in assessment]] - [[ai-literacy-governance-and-authenticity-in-higher-education|AI literacy, governance, and authenticity in higher education]] - [[ncca-ai-guidance-for-certification-programs|NCCA AI guidance for certification programmes]] - [[entrepreneurship-and-innovation-in-assessment-ai|Entrepreneurship and innovation in assessment AI]] ### Test security - [[remote-proctoring-and-invigilation-controls|Remote proctoring and invigilation controls]] - [[secure-browsers-and-controlled-environments|Secure browsers and controlled environments]] - [[credential-security-and-verification|Credential security and verification]] - [[test-security-vendor-landscape|Test security vendor landscape]] - [[test-security-human-vs-ai-remote-proctoring|Human versus AI remote proctoring]] - [[test-security-compromised-item-detection-cat|Compromised item detection in computerised adaptive testing]] - [[test-security-comparison-proxy-interviews-ai-cheating-deepfakes|Proxy interviews, AI cheating, and deepfakes in recruitment security]]

- [[test-security]] - overview of integrity, proctoring, browser control, credential protection, cyber resilience, and fraud prevention - [[remote-proctoring-and-invigilation-controls]] - [[secure-browsers-and-controlled-environments]] - [[credential-security-and-verification]] - [[test-security-vendor-landscape]] - [[test-security-detection-vs-redesign]] - [[test-security-assurance-approaches]] - [[test-security-compromised-item-detection-cat]] - [[test-security-detection-vs-wellbeing]] - [[test-security-online-assessment-failures]] - [[test-security-paper-versus-digital-exams]] - [[test-security-remote-proctoring-provider-evaluation]] - [[test-security-commerical-contract-cheating-websites-literacy]] - [[test-security-comparison-proxy-interviews-ai-cheating-deepfakes]] - [[identity-verification-and-authentication]] - [[regulator-positions]] - [[ofqual-remote-invigilation-vtq]] - [[test-security-human-vs-ai-remote-proctoring]]

- [[ai-in-assessment]] - [[test-security]] - [[ai-and-media-literacy-in-assessment]] - [[ai-marking-and-feedback-platforms]] - [[qualtrics-survey-generative-ai-survey-for-assessment-professionals]] - [[prometric-secures-industrys-first-us-patent-for-ai-powered-assessment-technology]] - [[state-of-ai-report-2024]] - [[source-coverage]]

- [[test-security-source-note-asrg]] - [[test-security-source-note-asrg-devices-of-deception]] - [[test-security-source-note-caveon-observer]] - [[test-security-source-note-cognisense]] - [[test-security-source-note-compilatio]] - [[test-security-source-note-cursive-technology-inc]] - [[test-security-source-note-eaa-online-proctoring-sig-webinar-ai-in-online-proctoring]] - [[test-security-source-note-fiji-cheating-trend]] - [[test-security-source-note-germany-driving-exam-cheating]] - [[test-security-source-note-hidden-in-plain-sight-wearable-technology]] - [[test-security-source-note-ielts-score-changes]] - [[test-security-source-note-kryterion-databricks]] - [[test-security-source-note-kseab-sslc-2026-paper-leak]] - [[test-security-source-note-kuwait-cheating-app]] - [[test-security-source-note-lsat-china]] - [[test-security-source-note-managing-malpractice-and-maladministration]] - [[test-security-source-note-ncta-atp-online-observation-of-tests-standards]] - [[test-security-source-note-pearson-palm-print-id]] - [[test-security-source-note-remote-assessment-vendor-evaluation]] - [[test-security-source-note-remote-testing-experience]] - [[test-security-source-note-south-africa-teen-suicide]] - [[test-security-source-note-star-tutors-indicted-for-buying-test-questions-from-teachers]] - [[test-security-source-note-test-delivery-polarisation]] - [[test-security-source-note-uneb-arrests-exam-cheating]] - [[test-security-source-note-using-keystroke-dynamics-to-detect-nonoriginal-text]] - [[test-security-source-note-vibe-coding-cheating-apps]] - [[test-security-source-note-waec-neco-anti-malpractice]] - [[test-security-source-note-zunoma]] - [[test-security-source-note-ao-forum-regulator-panels]]

- Internal wiki index maintained from topic pages and source coverage logs.

- More primary regulator publications would strengthen pages on policy and qualification design. - More independent validation studies would strengthen pages on AI marking, feedback quality, item generation, and automated essay scoring. - More implementation case studies would help distinguish classroom, professional certification, and high-stakes testing use cases. - More evidence is needed on the environmental, labour, and dependency costs of AI procurement in assessment settings. - More evidence is needed on process-focused assessment models and oral verification designs beyond early practitioner descriptions. - More independent evidence is needed on cognitive offloading, metacognitive laziness, and long-term learning outcomes. - More evidence is needed on whether assessment systems can reliably verify learner judgement, not just polished outputs. - More independent published evidence would strengthen the TCN source themes on item-generation workflows, expert-in-the-loop governance, and explainable marking. - More independent evidence is needed on AI detector robustness, especially against adversarial techniques and across language groups.